Which case emphasizes the necessity for a public nuisance to affect a class?

The case that emphasizes the necessity for a public nuisance to affect a class is A.G. v P.Y.A. Quarries. This case established an important principle in nuisance law, specifically addressing the distinction between public and private nuisances.

In this case, the court clarified that for a nuisance to be classified as a public nuisance, it must interfere with the rights of the public at large or a considerable segment of the community. The ruling highlighted that an action could be initiated by the Attorney General on behalf of the public when an act affects a class of people rather than only individuals. This emphasis on collective impact is crucial in distinguishing public nuisance from private nuisance, which affects individual property rights.

Understanding this case helps clarify the legal framework around public nuisances and the conditions under which they can be deemed unlawful. The ruling serves as a foundational element in tort law, delineating responsibilities and liabilities related to nuisances affecting broader societal interests.