What types of loss are recognized in private nuisance according to St-Helen's Smelting v Tipping?

In the case of St-Helen's Smelting v Tipping, the court recognized that private nuisance predominantly involves two categories of loss: property damages and loss of amenity. Property damages refer to any kind of physical harm or damage to the claimant's property as a result of the nuisance. This could include damage to structures, landscaping, or any other physical element of the property that is impacted by the nuisance.

Loss of amenity concerns the aspect of enjoyment and use of one’s property. This type of loss relates to how the nuisance can affect a person's ability to enjoy their living space, which might result from noise, unpleasant odors, or other disruptive factors created by a neighboring property or activity. Essentially, it addresses the intangible aspects of living quality that can be compromised through nuisance.

The other choices do not capture the essence of what is recognized as compensable losses in a private nuisance context, making the identification of property damages and loss of amenity as the correct answer significant in understanding the legal framework surrounding private nuisance claims.