In which case was it established that a tortfeasor can be held accountable for certain nuisances?

The establishment that a tortfeasor can be held accountable for certain nuisances is significant in tort law. The case of Malone v Laskey is particularly important in understanding this concept. In this case, the court ruled that the defendant, who was responsible for the maintenance of an improperly functioning sewer line, could be held liable for the nuisance it caused.

This case highlighted the principle that a party can be held accountable for actions leading to a nuisance as long as they had control over the situation that resulted in the harm. The ruling emphasized that liability doesn't solely depend on ownership or direct action but can also be based on the level of control and responsibility a person has over the condition creating the nuisance.

Other cases mentioned may touch on similar themes but don't create the same precedent regarding accountability for nuisances linked to control or responsibility. Therefore, Malone v Laskey serves as a foundational case in establishing accountability for nuisances in tort law.